RiskFits

How to Build a Dunning Process: From Reminder to Legal

How to structure a B2B dunning process: stages by days past due, channels, tone at each contact, when to hold shipments and when to escalate.

· 4 min read

A dunning process is the defined sequence of actions a company runs from before the due date to formal escalation. Without one, collections follow whoever has time: the big account gets called, the small one gets forgotten, and the order of work is set by memory rather than by risk.

The principle: recovery decays with time

Recovery rates fall sharply as an account ages. Balances worked in the first 15 days are collected in large majority; past 180 days, recovery is usually a small fraction. That defines the shape of the process: most of the effort belongs at the front, where return per contact is highest.

Structure by days past due

TimingActionChannelTone
3 days before dueReminderEmailInformational
Due dateNotice with invoice copyEmailNeutral
1 to 5 daysFirst active contactPhoneCordial, find the cause
6 to 15 daysAccount owner callsPhone and emailFirm, with a date
16 to 30 daysFormal notice and shipping holdLetter and emailFormal
31 to 60 daysSettlement proposalPhone and meetingNegotiation
61 to 90 daysCredit reporting, lien or demand letterFormalInstitutional
Over 90 daysThird-party agency or counselFormalInstitutional

Timing varies with your business cycle. The design does not: preventive, active, formal, negotiated, escalated.

The contact before the due date

The highest-return stage is not collection — it is the reminder. In B2B, a large share of lateness comes from the customer's own administrative failures: a lost invoice, a purchase order mismatch, an internal approval sitting in someone's queue. A reminder clears that before it becomes past due, with no relationship cost. More in preventive collections.

The first active contact

The goal in the first days is to find the cause, not to apply pressure. Causes fall into three groups, each with different handling:

Treating all three the same is the most common error: pressure applied to someone with an invoice problem, leniency granted to a company that is failing.

Collections that never asks the cause loses the most valuable information in the process. What the customer says on day 3 determines whether this is clerical or whether the limit has to drop today.

Holding new orders

The hold belongs in the process, with an objective threshold and a defined release authority. Two practical rules:

  1. Automatic hold past the threshold in policy
  2. Release only on payment, a signed agreement, or logged approval from a higher authority

A hold that can be negotiated without criteria becomes a monthly argument with sales — and stops being a control.

Who collects at each stage

Leaving all collections to the rep destroys the commercial relationship; removing the rep entirely loses the most effective contact channel in B2B. The balance is for sales to participate without owning the process.

Documentation

Log the date, channel, who you spoke to, what was said and what was promised. That history supports the next negotiation, backs any legal action, and feeds the customer's risk analysis.

Process metrics

What to take from this

Build the sequence with defined stages, timing and owners, concentrate effort in the first 30 days, and always ask the cause. Holds need objective criteria and a release path — and every contact needs to be logged.

Related reading